Blog

SOC 2 CC4.1 Ongoing and Separate Evaluations

CC4 Monitoring Activities Imagine you’re looking at your weekly backup report. Every job succeeded. Nothing needs your attention, so you move on. A few weeks later, your team runs a restoration exercise. The backup is there, but nobody running the exercise can retrieve the key needed to decrypt it. Recovery

Read More »

SOC 2 CC3.4 Identifying and Assessing Changes

Imagine someone on your team removes an approval step to make a routine process easier. The change looks sensible to the people doing the work. Then, at the next risk meeting, you discover that the step was there to protect a customer commitment. Nobody asked the control owner before it

Read More »

SOC 2 CC3.3: Fraud Risk

Consider deliberate misuse before it happens Imagine your team is gathering evidence for a customer review. Someone notices that several access reviews required by your policy were completed late. A manager suggests changing the dates so the records look consistent with the process. That’s an uncomfortable moment, and it’s worth

Read More »

SOC 2 CC3.2: Identifying and Analyzing Risks

Give the risk a useful description Imagine opening your risk register and finding an entry labeled “data loss,” rated high. Your engineering team points to the daily backups, and everyone moves on. Then you run a recovery exercise. Restoring a large customer account takes longer than the recovery time you’ve

Read More »

SOC 2 CC3.1: Specifying Suitable Objectives

Agree on the result before assessing the risk Imagine you’re reviewing the week’s backup reports. Every job finished successfully, so the team feels good about recovery. Then a customer asks how quickly you could bring the service back. Sales says a few hours. Engineering says a full business day. Nobody

Read More »

SOC 2 CC1.5: Accountability

Understand SOC 2 CC1.5 with practical guidance on control ownership, management follow-up, incentives, and evidence for teams of 5, 100, or 1,000.

Read More »

How to Conduct an AI Impact Assessment: The Path to ISO 42001 Certification

A key component of ISO 42001 certification is conducting an Artificial Intelligence Impact Assessment (AIIA).  This assessment helps your organization identify how your AI program creates both opportunities and risks to relevant stakeholders and society at large. This assessment is vital to determine what resources are needed to address negative

Read More »

NIST AI RMF: Proven Strategies for Risk-Aware AI Governance

With 80% of healthcare organizations expected to leverage intelligent automation this year, the question is no longer if your organization needs AI risk governance — it’s how quickly you can implement it. ISO/IEC 42001 is an international management system standard for AI, published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

Read More »